Welcome back! Sorry for the long delay in weather related ramblings but I was busy taking the NY bar exam for fun. Why not right? What harm can being admitted to a third state cause? Anyway, I’m back and full of weather talk. So here we go.

As many of you have noticed it has rained quite a bit this summer. For those of you who were running with me on Sunday it rained on us enough to satisfy an entire month of water needs!

But how wet has it been?

The short answer- Historically wet!

For example, Albany, NY set a record with 9.91 inches of rain. The previous record of 9.37 inches was set in 1871! Albany also had average July temperature of 68.3 degrees which was the third coldest on record. BRRRR!

Of course the next question any true famous internet skier would ask is: what does that mean for winter? While the appropriate response is buy me some beer or show me a naked picture of your sister and I’ll tell you. However I’m too nice for that (and I already have pictures of your sister…woof.) Plus I’m bored at work. Therefore, I’ll just tell you.

Sticking with Albany, the other wettest Julys are:
1871, 1850, 1848, 1863, 2005, 2007, 1975 and 1970.
The other coolest Julys are:
1992, 2001, 1971, 1976, 1824, 1875, 1978, 1965 and 2001.

Interestingly, there is not ONE other year where there was a record cold July AND and record wet July. That’s part of what makes this July historic. It also has to factor into our interpretation of what this July means for the upcoming winter.

The Mt. Mansfield snow stake, showing total snow depth, for the above years shows:

The Wet Years:

1975-1976 Winter

2005-2006 Winter

2007-2008 Winter

The Cold Years

1965-1966 Winter

1971-1972 winter

1976-1977 Winter

1978-1979 winter

1992-1993 Winter

2001-2002 Winter

Looking at the snow stake data, it appears that having a cold July is more likely to lead to an above average depth on Mt. Mansfield. The effect of a wet July is hard to judge because there is simply not enough data to look at. Additionally, we can rule out 2007 and 2005 as good analogies because both those winters were not el nino winters, and this winter an el nino pattern will prevail.


WTF?! – A photo contest.

By: Sam
August 4, 2009 1:11 pm | Category: Skiing | Comment | Permalink

Greg and I are competing to see who has the best collection of photos that make you go “WTF?!” We’re taking submissions as well, so send em on in!

A sample entry:
null

The rest of my entries are HERE


New calendars are getting printed

By: Greg
August 3, 2009 1:37 pm | Category: Site News, Skiing | Comment | Permalink

We just sent the proofs over to the printer for the new calendars. We have a White Mountain edition and a Green Mountain edition. Click one of the following to view and pre-order each (will ship on or before August 21):





Google Earth’s historical imagery

By: Greg
July 17, 2009 9:41 am | Category: Skiing | 1 Comment | Permalink

I just found out about Google Earth’s historical imagery feature. Needless to say the first thing I looked for is winter-month imagery. While there don’t seem to be many winter satellite images for the mountain regions of the Northeast, there are a couple of May views. Here’s one of The Ravines from May of 1994 (click for a larger view). Was this historically snowy, or just about average? Looks pretty good to me right about now:

google_earth_mtwash_snow

I did a lot of flying around last night checking things out. Already building up a list for next year!

I guess if we can’t have winter year round in New England, the best we can do is look at satellite pictures of it!


As the north country endures another round of upper level low induced summer suckage you have to wonder exactly what that means for the upcoming winter.

First the answer is it has nothing to do with the upcoming winter. Any historical stat – espically with winter is just an expression of what happened in the past. As anybody knows – if you flip a coin 50 times and it lands on heads 50 times that doesn’t mean it will land on heads the 51st time. Now you say-well it should tell you that something is up with the coin and you can expect heads…and you might be right. Perhaps the coin is weighted funny. Perhaps you’re playing a cheater. Who knows. Well the same goes for the weather. Looking at historical data should only tell you that something is afoot. It should give you a guide for watching how things develop.

And so with that crap out of the way let me begin.

I noticed that the Artic Oscillation (AO) is extremely negative and has been so since early june.

AO observed and forecasted

In fact it’s been strongly negative. Since 1950 only seven other years have featured a june with such a strongly negative AO.
They were: 1951, 1957, 1958, 1982, 1987, 1997 and 1998.

So taking those years I figured lets look at what Mt. Mansfield shows as snowfall for the winter following those years.

1958


Total snow depth 1958

1959


Total snow depth 1959

1983


Total snow depth 1983

1988

Total snow depth 1988

1998



Total snow depth 1998

1999


Total snow depth 1999

Sadly examining this snow stake data is inconslusive. Early years showed a slightly below normal snow depth and the later years show a slightly above average snow depth. Clearly no conclusion can be drawn.

Perhaps we can draw some conclusions regarding what the weather might be based on comparing the years above with the AO in the corrseponding winters.

As you can see from the chart below, A negative AO generally leads to below average temperatures for the East and North east when the Negative AO occurs in J/F/M.

AO to US Surface Temp

So what did these years have for the AO? (Numbers are D, J, F, M)

51/52: -1.9, -.85, -.4, -1.9

57/58: .8, -1.4, -2.2, -2.5

58/59: -1.67, -2.013, 2.5, 1.4

82/83: .967, 1.359, -1.806, -.567

87/88: -.534, .265, -1.066, -.197

97/98: -.071, -2.081, -.183, -.254

98/99: 1.353, .110, .482, -1.492

Looking at these numbers again is not conclusive BUT they do show that 75% of the time these winters exhibted a negative AO which is a good thing for our temperatures.

With a building “west based” el nino, which leads to cooler east coast temps the best guess at this time is that the signs point to a cool winter. Wish I could say all signs point to constant bombed out coastal lows but that’s reality!


Stay in touch: Click here to follow us on Twitter. Click here to subscribe for updates to be delivered via RSS. Click here to become a fan on Facebook. Click here to read and share real time weather observations. Learn more over at the account. It's awesome. We promise!